InfoMagic Internet Tools 1995 April/Internet Tools.iso/dos_win/winsock/maillist/94-05.Z/94-05/text0183.txt

Text File | 1994-05-31 | 8.8 KB | 215 lines

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Rob Clift) writes:
>The other day someone posted a message indicating that an NSLOOKUP-type
>application called WSHOST was available from the CICA Windows archive.
>I have not been able to connect to CICA because of heavy traffic, and
>have been unable to find this file in the CICA mirror sites.  Can
>anyone confirm that this file really exists?
>
>---
>[e-mail]

    Current location is /pub/pc/win3/uploads

    Cheers
    Paul
From [e-mail] Tue May 13 13:52:55 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA10568; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:15:08 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA27691; Fri, 13 May 1994 09:52:20 -0400
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: 13 May 1994 13:52:55 GMT
From: [e-mail] (Christopher G Kolar)
Message-Id: <2r00nn$[e-mail]>
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Sender: ses
Subject: Trumpet News: another canot post problem (parsing date header)

I was using the winTrumpet newsreader (1.0 Rev B) with no problems, but in the
  last 24 hours I have been unable to post.  When I connect to the nntp
  server I receive the message "Posting failed -- 441 cannot parse 'date'
  header."

Having read the earlier postings, I checked the date and time of my
  system (they are both synced with my server when I start up, so I
  figured that this would not be a problem).  I have been able to send
  mail with with trumpet news -- the date header on mail sent to myself
  is accureate and the headers look correct.

Can anyone help me out with this?  Thanks in advance for help and advice,


--chris
--
/////\\\\\/////\\\\\/////\\\\\             The University of Illinois
Christopher G Kolar                           at Urbana-Champaign
Cognitive Flexibility Laboratory           Internet: [e-mail]
Center for the Study of Reading           NovaNET:  chris / mfl / nova
From [e-mail] Tue May 13 14:01:22 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA10579; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:15:10 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA27666; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:01:26 -0400
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: 13 May 1994 14:01:22 GMT
From: [e-mail] (Christopher Kolar)
Message-Id: <2r017i$[e-mail]>
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Sender: ses
Subject: cannot post problem with winTrump 1.0B


I was using the winTrumpet newsreader (1.0 Rev B) with no problems, but in the
  last 24 hours I have been unable to post.  When I connect to the nntp
  server I receive the message "Posting failed -- 441 cannot parse 'date'
  header."

Having read the earlier postings, I checked the date and time of my
  system (they are both synced with my server when I start up, so I
  figured that this would not be a problem).  I have been able to send
  mail with with trumpet news -- the date header on mail sent to myself
  is accureate and the headers look correct.

Can anyone help me out with this?  Thanks in advance for help and advice,


--chris

--
/////\\\\\/////\\\\\/////\\\\\             The University of Illinois
Christopher G Kolar                           at Urbana-Champaign
Cognitive Flexibility Laboratory           Internet: [e-mail]
Center for the Study of Reading           NovaNET:  chris / mfl / nova
From [e-mail] Tue May 13 13:00:35 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA17933; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:45:08 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA27310; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:32:23 -0400
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: 13 May 1994 13:00:35 GMT
From: [e-mail] (Jenwen)
Message-Id: <2qvtlj$[e-mail]>
Organization: Dep. Computer Sci. & Information Eng., Chiao Tung Univ., Taiwan, R.O.C
Sender: ses
References: <2qv4hk$[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: alt.winsock.binaries???

Nickolas ([e-mail]) wrote:
: Hello people,
:
:    I was thinking how  about making a group for binary posting?
: It would better for some one who wants to release there winsock
: software. Just a thought ;)
:
:     [e-mail]

I agree!! Since it seem so many ask where Trumpet? where ..

Jenwen,Chien-Wen Huang
[e-mail]
From [e-mail] Fri May 13 10:45:14 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA17959; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:45:14 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA27248; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:30:51 -0400
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 15:16:55 UNDEFINED
From: [e-mail] (Mike Salmon)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia
Sender: ses
References: <2qv4hk$[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: alt.winsock.binaries???

In article <2qv4hk$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Nickolas) writes:
>   I was thinking how  about making a group for binary posting?
>It would better for some one who wants to release there winsock
>software. Just a thought ;)

What's wrong with comp.binaries.ms-windows?

Binary groups should be restricted to <major-division>.binaries.<name> anyway,
so sites connected by damp string can exclude them all easily.

cheers

mike.

_____________________________________________________________________
Mike Salmon, Climatic Research Unit,   |
University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK | "No! The _other_ starboard!"
[e-mail]      [phone] |
From [e-mail] Fri May 13 17:04:21 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA17969; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:45:16 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA27578; Fri, 13 May 1994 10:35:46 -0400
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 17:04:21 GMT
From: Vic Kamhi <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Sender: ses
References: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 32 bit access with SCSI no available. Hunh? was Re: Win Mosaic alpha 4 (my fix)


In article <[e-mail]>,
>
> My questions are...
>
> Can you buy comparable large hard disks for IDE controllers?
> At the same price?
> Are the driver problems we are experiencing ever going to be resolved?
>
> Peter
>

Apparently Enhanced IDE drives are on their way. The claims are:
1) bigger drives supported without kludges
2) more drives supported (4 instead of 2)
3) non-disk devices (i.e., CD-ROMS) supported
4) faster (near SCSI) speeds
Reports in the trade press (take that for what it's worth!) say that you
should be seeing the Enhanced IDE stuff by this fall in many high-end
(i.e., 486DX3 and Pentium) systems. They say that Phillips (?) will be
introducing an IDE CD-ROM almost as you read this.

Except that SCSI still can support more devices per chain (but many don't
need 6!), more types of devices (scanners, tape drives; but, again, not
everybody needs these), and will still be inherantly faster (except, of
course, for the proviso about 32-bit under Windows), this new IDE system
might be just what the doctor ordered for many!

--VIC
From [e-mail] Fri May 13 11:14:57 1994
Received: from MIT.EDU (MIT.MIT.EDU) by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA25875; Fri, 13 May 1994 11:14:57 -0400
Received: from ASHPOOL.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
    id AA29105; Fri, 13 May 94 11:14:55 EDT
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Reccomend wfw?
Date: Fri, 13 May 94 11:14:54
From: [e-mail] (Paul B. Hill )

>I have WFW 3.11 working with the April beta of MS TCP/IP. I used to have
>LAN Workplace running my Winsock stack, but when I went to WFW, LAN
>workplace became an unmanageable mess. I have since added Frontier's
>SuperTCP/NFS to the picture, which went fairly smoothly, and added a lot
>of features. It has replaced MS TCP/IP, and all my Winsock apps are happy
>with it.

We have several user running LWP with WFWG 3.1 and 3.11. Everything works
very well if you understand how to install the products.